How to write a good discussion scientific paper

Discussion questions for scientific articles

Explicitly state this result. Which target journal should be selected? At Proof-Reading-Service. The discussion section should end with a concise summary of the principal implications of the findings regardless of their significance. To tackle this problem, we developed a new software verification technique called oblivious hashing, which calculates the hash values based on the actual execution of the program. Also do not repeat your results, this is a discussion. What was the overarching hypothesis? The description of findings [results] and the interpretation of their significance [discussion] should be distinct sections of your paper. Can you answer your research question? Shortcomings of the Study In this section, explain any limitations that your hypothesis or experimental approach might have and the reasoning behind it. If applicable, begin this part of the section by repeating what you consider to be your most significant or unanticipated finding first, then systematically review each finding. Use the present verb tense, especially for established facts; however, refer to specific works and references in the past tense. Make Suggestions for Further Research You may choose to conclude the discussion section by making suggestions for further research [this can be done in the overall conclusion of your paper]. This can include re-visiting key sources already cited in your literature review section, or, save them to cite later in the discussion section if they are more important to compare with your results instead of being a part of the general literature review of research used to provide context and background information.

Do not simply summarize the points already made in the body — instead, interpret your findings at a higher level of abstraction. Begin by briefly re-stating the research problem you were investigating and answer all of the research questions underpinning the problem that you posed in the introduction.

how to write a discussion in a lab report

To make this section interesting, explain the choices you made in your experimental procedure: What justifies using a given compound, concentration, or dimension? Be concise and make your points clearly. The discussion section should remain focused on the findings of your study.

Discussion section scientific writing

Scientific Writing Workshops If you like our articles, try our workshops! At the end of your Conclusion, consider including perspectives — that is, an idea of what could or should still be done in relation to the issue addressed in the paper. However writing manuscripts is a challenging endeavour in that we physicians have a heavy workload, and English which is common language used for the dissemination of scientific knowledge is not our mother tongue. Chris A. For the second part, mention your findings the what and, especially, your conclusion the so what — that is, the interpretation of your findings ; if appropriate, end with perspectives, as in the Conclusion section of your paper. If you use a standard or usual procedure, mention that upfront, too. They can be usefully applied to scientific discussions of all kinds, but do remember to prioritise any specific publisher or instructor guidelines that must be followed as the decisions about how to write a scientific discussion are made. In conclusion, academic writing is similar to other skills, and practice makes perfect. This should recapitulate whether the work included animals, cell culture, human subjects, or other novel techniques.

The greatest problem with this study, however, was compliance. However, generally, before onset of the writing process of the manuscript, its abstract might be already presented in various congresses.

How to write a discussion for a scientific paper example

In other words, the task clarifies your contribution as a scientist, whereas the object of the document prepares readers for the structure of the paper, thus allowing focused or selective reading. In fact editors of the journal will not reserve the limited space in their journal for articles yielding similar conclusions. This paragraph should be well-rounded, meaning that contrary reports must also be discussed. Writing the Discussion. Be certain that you clearly identify your comments as speculation or as a suggestion for where further research is needed. A schematic of your proposed mechanism or model can often be helpful for clearly and concisely summarizing your major result s. Do not simply repeat information and sentences from the report of results and assume that they will serve as interpretation and explanation. Should you need to remind the reader of the finding to be discussed, use "bridge sentences" that relate the result to the interpretation.

In this way you relate your own results to the store of scientific knowledge. When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases.

Writing the Discussion.

Rated 10/10 based on 118 review
Discussion and Conclusions